Показать сообщение отдельно
  #9  
Старый 04.12.2008, 19:01
Marty Marty вне форума
Member
 
Регистрация: 23.10.2007
Сообщения: 39
По умолчанию

Цитата:
actually i think it would be cool if everyone could jump in here. since i'm here, i'll go first.

in my understanding, i think you can basically break it down to;

90° is the angle you want to maintain with respect to your force relative to your opponents mass

while 45° is the angle you want to create or maintain with respect to your opponents force relative to your mass, and also the point of contact. if you can create a 45° angle at the point, it's tough for the opponent to grab or even apply force (i.e. "no landing").

what do you think marty?

chris, who are you training with? (just curious)
Yes, this is how I understand the strategy. So while there is no fixed response in dealing with an incoming punch at medium to close range, one way as I see in keeping with this principle it is to attack the strike while moving off center giving your opponent 45 (which places him in a disadvantaged position) and gives you 90 for continued attack. Now, at a greater distance one should be able to negate an attack by applying this principle of only giving one's opponent 45 by continually changing as he changes.